12 thoughts on “Inspire Nation Interview Late December 2023”

  • I remember last year, I was listening to one of his premiering videos so he or his team were able to chat with us listeners. I told them they should try and reach you. This will be good!

    Liked by 2 people

    Reply

  • Christian said it was hard to find words to describe his experiences, but I completely understood what he was saying. He said everything so well. This was a wonderful podcast that I will listen to numerous times!

    Like

    Reply

  • Hi Christian. Thank you again for your talk on your prebirth experiences.
    You two have had a lot of funand it is very nice to see that.
    Just some question.
    What is this “energetically sensitive” that you talk about ?
    Can you refer me to some information on that ?
    I would be so gratefull.

    Kind regards,

    Lisa

    Like

    Reply

    • Hi Lisa! The way I use that term is someone who is sensitive to non-physical energy within consciousness/ spirit (and therefore typically, simultaneously and consequently, usually sensitivity to physical energies, sensory input, or substances as well). It primarily means sensitivity to vibrations that are typically not physically measurable but are very much perceivable in a much more full way in higher reality systems: for example, the vibrational nature of another being (their “soul qualities,” for instance). This is difficult to describe though, and also I use the term broadly to point to sensitivity to perception of any of the many vibrations within spirit. As another example, the meaning of any given word even has its own vibration within consciousness. Does that help? If not please hone me in. Have a great day experiencing being human today! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

  • Thank you, Christian, for explaining.
    Would you say that this also goes for being able to get a taste of something just by tuning in to the article on the shelf in the shop. So you know it tastes well and you can buy it. Or maybe being able to drag some large object behind you, not looking at it, dragging it through a narrow path, and feeling the object behind you and the space it takes, to manouvre through this narrow path without touching anything. As if you have eyes in your back.
    Would you say these are also a form of this energetical sensitivity ?
    .
    Thanks for splitting me from my human form in your greetings. I like that 🙂

    Like

    Reply

  • I have the paperback which I got the day after hearing this beautiful luminous message and am loving it. Thank you for your courage to share your knowledge. Love and blessings. Eileen. Xxx

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  • Hi Christian,
    I’ve heard you mention many times in your YouTube interviews about Tom Campbell’s My Big Toe book that inspired you.
    My question is : how much of Tom’s presented model do you think is accurate from your experience ? Please, if you can, do talk more about that, either here of elsewhere in a blog or interview, so we can all get a sense of your perspective on Tom’s work.
    Thanks a lot for your book. It’s really enlightening 🙂

    Like

    Reply

    • Thank you for your kindness! In response to your question about Tom Campbell’s MBT work:

      Overall I very much appreciate and value Tom’s work. I think his model gives us some valuable language and metaphors that can help us to understand or describe the bigger picture. I feel that in broad terms, at least from my own experience, his model is sound and useful. He is a powerful teacher who is bringing a message of love in through the language of our time. I remain very grateful to “Uncle Tom” and I am proud to share the message of his work!

      That being said, here are just a few comments and criticisms.

      I feel that Tom is attempting to bring validity to the very real higher context by presenting his model in a neutral, scientific way. His model is intellectually-minded, rather than heart-minded. Indeed, as an intellectually-focused individual up until my awakening, his model was exactly what I personally needed to help me “push open the door,” and go look for myself (ultimately experientially, rather than just intellectually). That being said, I feel his language-set isn’t for everybody.

      My primary (constructive) criticism would be that I feel Tom’s language can seem dry and clinical. Whereas in fact, what we are attempting to describe is incredibly full of vibrance and life!- it is rich, full of unspeakable depth and feeling- it is the opposite of dry. Clinical language can be valuable when attempting to describe something scientifically (our scientific process attempts to remain objective and neutral). But it might not be helpful to someone who is seeking to intuitively feel-understand.

      Also as I’ve heard Tom himself say, I think it is important to not confuse his model (or any model) with reality. That is: his model is just that- a model- a metaphor-set. It is not literally describing the bigger picture, because, even as Tom says, and as I have attempted to say many times, that can’t be done. His metaphor-set is largely focused on modern computer metaphors, and I think those are generally apt to help us understand. I would say sometimes though I think it is important to lift up more often that the “computer” is not heartless, but rather ultimately built in love and great wisdom.

      Outside of a number of smaller comments, I would say the most significant comment I’ve heard Tom make that I don’t agree with is that we “don’t meet our loved ones when we die”- that is, I’ve heard him say rather we meet just representations of them. Now, since he’s said that in a few early videos, I’ve heard him subsequently clarify his comments on that question (sorry that I don’t have a link on hand) to more closely align with my understanding: see in Tom’s model, we aren’t the human form-set anyway, we are consciousness itself (I agree), so Tom might say when you are interacting with a loved one even here on Earth, you aren’t really interacting with “the real them” either- it’s just an avatar they are playing. I feel it is important to lift up though that by interacting with their consciousness, you are indeed interacting with them (through the simulation’s virtual context). Our loving relationships are valuable and important! Love is what we are, and love is about relationship. Agreed that one Earth life’s relationships are just a very small piece of a much larger history and self, and also even agreed that in some thought responsive systems a guide might temporarily take on the appearance of “Uncle Frank” (someone you love) in order to assist you, but those points aside, since love is our true nature, I feel it is also important to realize that our loving relationships are not lost, and are deeply meaningful. Indeed, they can be re-visited, or even deepened, not only in in-between-physical-lifetime environments, but also potentially in future mutual incarnation experiences, should we so choose. In other words, since love is what we are, our relationships are valuable. We really can interact with and further our relationship with those we love after a physical lifetime is complete, should we wish. (It’s just that our post-life or post-given-personality-viewpoint may be a much, much higher/ deeper “vantage point” than what we know now, and that is important. A given relationship from a given lifetime may actually not be that significant within the larger picture. As a very simple example, when I was a child and my guinea pig died, I mourned and felt that relationship so very deeply. Now, it seems much less important to me. But is that relationship still valuable somehow, now? Oh yes: the love I knew through and from that animal lasts, and my bond with that being who played my guinea pig lasts, too. We may celebrate it later, if we wish. Every experience, and every relationship, is ultimately valuable to the soul!)

      I hope that helps sir!

      Like

      Reply

Leave a reply to Lisa Cancel reply