A Walk in the Physical is now available in German (in addition to French and Spanish)! Many, many thanks to Jörg Starkmuth for his great efforts. Not only did he provide proofreading of the original English version, he has now finished the German translation and has taken on the work of printing and shipping the German book himself through his Starkmuth Publishing company. Here is a link to his site! https://starkmuth.de/produkt/schritte-auf-der-erde/
- Comment
- Reblog
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
A Walk in the Physical 
Thrilling news! Congratulations, Christian!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great news Christian! Fabulous! 🤩❤️
I was going to contact you the other day. Previously you mentioned that you had thought of creating a few of your own videos, and if you decide to do so, I wondered if you would consider my suggestion as one of your themes …
One of the things that really stands out for me (and there are several!) when I listen to your interviews is the fact that you have been working through and resolving very deep fear, and you have been successful at doing it.
I’m not great at meditating, whereas you seem to be highly disciplined and focused. I suspect I am not alone in this struggle. On the other hand, I have had some success in peeling off some layers of ‘garbage’, as it were. I now feel stuck, and seem to be unsure how to tackle the deeper layers on certain issues.
I wondered whether you could record a guided meditation to help people get deeper and tackle the deeper, harder to access fears? (Or maybe more than one video, each going deeper than the last?). People could listen to each video repeatedly if they needed to. I feel that if you were to do that, we would, in a sense, benefit from your ‘awareness’ as well as your method to get deeper and release those deeper fears.
On the other hand, if you have any tips for tackling deeper stuff, I would be grateful if you could share them. I try to access the feelings around an issue that intellectually I can see, in order to allow them so they can dissolve, but somehow struggle to raise those feelings. I suspect it is deep resistance to feeling the fear, though I believe it would be beneficial to feel then let go of it.
Many, many thanks Christian for all your sharing!
Amanda
LikeLike
Amanda, thank you for your comment! This is a meaningful suggestion, and also not the first time I’ve received it. I have been accumulating a list of topics to potentially cover if and when I start my own channel, but meanwhile this general angle of how to practically work through fear (as a process, even though it isn’t necessarily specifically a process) feels to me to be of primary importance. Regarding your own question, please email me (awalkinthephysical@gmail.com) and I would be happy to respond in more depth. Thank you much!
LikeLike
Hey Christian
What’s your take on Bashar’s saying that you can recreate yourself every moment, you’re not the one in the past etc. You can listen to him here for a few minutes: https://youtu.be/YstYvm6c45w?si=Qob-qRfWth6JJk9M&t=405 I can understand it figuratively speaking as not letting past define your whole life, but he says it literally as if one could (at the human level) just by making a statement completely change the past and thus the present, and reality doesn’t work like that … for instance lost limbs don’t grow back, liver failure due to years of alcoholism won’t disappear because the person redefines himself as never having been an alcoholic. Furthermore, this negates the fact that choices and actions have consequences. So I can’t figure out what he’s trying to communicate.
LikeLike
The video linked is no longer available, but I believe I’ve heard Bashar’s statements to that effect. Just a few comments in case they help sir.
First, when Bashar says there are infinite numbers of realities per second, I prefer the Tom Campbell phrasing that there are a very, very large number (practically infinite) number of *potential* realities that might unfold per unit time (trillions of units time pass per second), depending on the free willed choice making of every participant. In other words, there are trillions and trillions of unactualized paths (and one point I think can get confusing for many is that these unactualized paths can be viewed as full sensory data experiences in the records, as all information about them is maintained), but there is only one actualized path. (At least for a given reality frame/ a given reality “load”!- I suspect it’s possible that an entire physical reality could be copied-pasted from a given point and re-manned by players if that was beneficial for some reason, perhaps with some variable changed. Then that new “server” would have its own actualized path of choice making. I’m only speaking theoretically there though, as I do not know if and on what scale that might happen.)
Now, our physical reality has a rule-set of how it unfolds (we understand those crudely as physics). That rule-set only appears to be a deterministic materialist reality: in fact it is probabilistic in nature. So while past choices may have a high probability of yielding a current result (for instance, just as in your example, liver health due to past choices), our current moment of intention can *significantly* push the probabilities of current actualization in one direction or the other- possibly. So as an example, it is almost impossible (not ever technically impossible because the entire reality is virtual and probabilistic, but practically speaking, impossible) that a lost limb will regrow, but, where there is greater uncertainty especially (more malleable bodily health issues perhaps), our current intention and focus can very extremely push the outcome in a certain direction- causing the current actualization to reflect very much *as if* the past had been quite different. Realistically though the rules are very tenacious and firm, especially as the consensus we’ve created on Earth is precisely one in which those rules (probability curves) are firm, and our fear/ beliefs run deep (which limits flexibility).
That last point is important, because Bashar claims that if an entire collective shifted its agreement, or shifted its intention, the way that collective experienced a given reality frame could be very significantly altered. (I’m careful not to say “change the rules of the reality system”, because technically those rules are virtual probabilities and allow for the shift described- but in essence that’s what I mean).
This rule-set that reflects and responds to the intention, focus, beliefs, expectation, and agreements of the players is very efficient, actually, at helping the players learn (how to be creative beings) through choice making. For example, if you perceive the world as negative and something to be feared and thus have a negative world experience, that is an effective mirroring back to you as a player so that you can learn the power of your own interpretation. If you shift your intention, focus, beliefs, and expectations in any given moment, it is beneficial that the reality mirror those back to you, too.
I hope this helps sir!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Hey Christian
I left a comment which had an YouTube link and that probably made it go straight to the Spam folder. Can you check it please?
LikeLike
Hey Christian
As I understand it, Bashar’s model of reality is that everything that can happen already exists as un -actualised possibility, kind of like pictures on a film strip. When consciousness focuses on a series of those pictures, like the projector light, there unfolds what we call on Earth a life. Of course this happens within the limits of a particular reality … for instance on Earth life starts as baby and continues from there to a limit of around 100yrs, it doesn’t start as an 100yrs old person who gets younger every year and dies as a baby. 🙂
I’m trying to reconcile his model of reality with your pre birth experience, because according to his model, once your previous incarnation got scared and aborted mission, your higher self could focus again on that particular couple and their baby, which exists as a picture … the reality where the woman had the miscarriage is a parallel reality, totally distinct to the one where the same woman gives birth to the baby. So in your model, you missed the previous chance to incarnate as the baby of that particular couple so therefore you incarnated as Christian, whereas in Bashar’s model, there can’t be a missed chance. What’s you take on this?
LikeLike
It is not my experience that are simply infinite live realities already actualized somehow but just waiting around to be focused into, and I suspect that is not what Bashar is attempting to communicate. We do shift possible reality outcomes (and therefore what we might call reality “threads”) billions of times per second as all free willed choice making unfolds through every unit time, but just because there are many trillions of unactualized reality paths doesn’t mean they are all live. In my experience, any given reality has only one live path at any given point in “time” and many trillions of now-unactualized paths, which are all kept in the “database” for information and review. What can be confusing to some I think is that then those unactualized paths (perhaps what you are referring to as a “picture”) *can* be focused into within the “database” (what we call the Akashic Records), and doing so yields *all* sense data of that would-be-possible-reality-context very fully and accurately, and so can very much *feel like* focusing into a live reality, when in fact it is more like a recording. In other words there are an absolutely huge amount of possible-but-unactualized reality states, but once they are in an unactualized state, even though they are retained as a record, they are no longer live playing fields- they are just (basically unalterable) recordings. Now, I do not know how many live reality frames the whole system is actually running- there could be a huge number- but in my pre-birth planning the extreme preciousness and irreplacable-ness of any one life opportunity was very much known! So it was not a matter of simply re-loading the entire live simulation from some point. In other words, after I had aborted the first incarnation attempt, that opportunity was lost: that reality had “moved on,” and I had nudged outcomes by my choice to reject the life and cause the body to die. Sure that could be engaged/ re-reviewed as a “picture” (non-live reality context), but that is not the same as a live “live with the results of your choices” reality: there is a big difference between… say, watching a recorded movie about someone working on fixing a car, and actually getting under a live car and making choices yourself and living with the consequences. In our reality, once you rip a part of the car out, sometimes you screwed up the car and now you’ve gotta live with it- and that is part of the value and novelty of the simulation. Does that help sir?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, this is just theoretical discussion with no way of proving one way or the other. It just sounds to me that Bashar’s model is more accurate than Tom Campbell’s … to use the game analogy, Tom’s model is like an 1980s video-game (very simple, few options) while Bashar’s is more like what is available nowadays (much more complex, multi layered). So my idea is that if the games we have developed in the last 40yrs are so complex, then the bigger reality surely is more complex than simply incarnate, live, die, life review, incarnate again, all this done just one at a time and in a linear fashion.
As I understand Bashar, he says that the oversoul, which is outside of time-space constraints decides to focus consciousness (incarnate) according to what it wants to experience/learn. From its level it happens all in the now, although in our reality of time-space we would describe it as an incarnation born in 1350, one in 1854, another in 2050 and so on. But, and here is the key, they are not on the same Earth, there is no ‘The Earth’ … they are all parallel versions of Earths, each a projection of that consciousness, some of which might look similar and other very different.
Regarding the databases and recordings: I agree, at the soul level, the experience is very precious and irreplaceable as you describe. But back at the oversoul level, it gets integrated and if the exploring theme is unfinished (it planned a whole life but then the soul aborted as an unborn baby) it can start again at the same level. The experience of the miscarriage remains as a recording in the database. But then the oversoul can focus again its consciousness on the same couple who just found out the woman got pregnant and being more experienced now, the probability is higher that original exploring theme will be carried out. The couple where the lady had the miscarriage continue their life on a parallel Earth to the couple where she doesn’t have a miscarriage and the woman gives birth to a healthy baby.
LikeLike
Another thought: Bashar also says that nothing can happen unless we agree to it (either on a human or a higher level … in that sense, he says there are no accidents, all is synchronicity).
I remember this being a sticking point I had with Tom’s model … random accidents … just didn’t make sense to me that such a powerful entity as a soul would just ‘randomly’ get hit and killed by a drunk driver. There it was in consciousness planning to experience life as a husband and grandad but he got struck by lightning when he was 20yrs old. Hmm… 🙂
So in the case of your pre birth memory, if the oversoul of that lady didn’t agree with experiencing the miscarriage, then she never independently existed, it all happened as a projection of your oversoul for your learning/growth benefit. If it did agree, then as said in above post, a version of it experienced it, while other versions would give birth to healthy baby or not get pregnant at all (perhaps that was another theme, experience the reality of not being able to get pregnant).
LikeLike
(Replying to both your recent comments here:)
Vlad,
I can only speak from my experience sir.
Regarding: “As I understand Bashar, he says that the oversoul, which is outside of time-space constraints decides to focus consciousness (incarnate) according to what it wants to experience/learn. From its level it happens all in the now” – Yes, all experiences happen in the one Now, agreed sir. It is not a process at all bound to our local linear time as we understand it.
Regarding: “But back at the oversoul level, it gets integrated and if the exploring theme is unfinished (it planned a whole life but then the soul aborted as an unborn baby) it can start again at the same level.” – What do you mean by “start again?” If you mean that an entire universe can be re-manned with players so that one being can re-experience or re-attempt one thing, that is not my experience. If you mean a situation or even a lifetime can be re-loaded- and perhaps even re-played as a simulation with some tweaks for an individual’s benefit, but *not* as a live free-will-outcome-driven simulation by all players, I would agree with that. Metaphorically we might call the first option an MMORPG, and the second a single player RPG. Any number of players can play any single player RPGs they’d like, but I feel there are not infinite MMORPGs- rather, there are a very large number, but even so, because they are limited, they are precious. I see the two very differently, and I believe the soul does as well. (Word usage note: I am not differentiating between the terms “soul” and “oversoul,” I use the terms “personality” and “soul” respectively).
Regarding: “So in the case of your pre birth memory, if the oversoul of that lady didn’t agree with experiencing the miscarriage, then she never independently existed.” – I definitely do not agree with this sir. It was my choice- my own fear- that caused the miscarriage, and that affected her (she was a real player, too). I’m sure her soul was aware at some level, but to say it was her choice too- or alternatively to imply that that experience was not a live free-will-manned experience- I feel both would be incorrect. I recognize that all souls are in contact with each other and in dialogue about the game they are playing: the lady may have agreed to be a mother subject to certain possibilities (may have known my rejection was possible), and we do agree to commit into certain contexts, but it is not my experience that we each consciously or pro-actively agree to every single thing that happens.
Regarding: “just didn’t make sense to me that such a powerful entity as a soul would just ‘randomly’ get hit and killed by a drunk driver.” – Are you implying that getting hit and killed by a drunk driver is somehow bad, or somehow a failure? I feel the novelty of possible unanticipated outcome is precisely one of the great values of our simulation.
Just for personal context, I am referencing a very holy experience to try to speak to these questions, just for me it is not a matter of postulating.
LikeLiked by 1 person
– What do you mean by “start again?”
RPG sounds more like what I had in mind, but I think the distinction doesn’t make any difference at the player level, since he doesn’t know and can’t tell which one is it. Furthermore, it’s highly likely the player doesn’t even consider being in a virtual reality.
– Are you implying that getting hit and killed by a drunk driver is somehow bad, or somehow a failure?
No, it might be exactly what the soul wanted to experience, or it might happen because the soul had already completed its life theme and just span the roulette wheel so to speak on a way to exit. But if the life is more planned and has certain milestones to be reached, then logic says such accidents can’t happen. They don’t happen in our world … the more resources and planning goes into something, the more backups and contingency measures are considered. For a silly example, if Joe Doe decides to go for a drive, he might run out of gas or have a flat tire and remain stranded on the road, if the President of the country decides to go somewhere by car, those situations just won’t happen.
Regarding #Just for personal context, I am referencing a very holy experience to try to speak to these questions, just for me it is not a matter of postulating.#
I don’t know exactly how to interpret this, I’m sorry if I’ve upset you with my theories, that wasn’t at all my intention.
LikeLike
Sir Vlad,
Regarding this: “then logic says such accidents can’t happen. They don’t happen in our world … the more resources and planning goes into something, the more backups and contingency measures are considered. For a silly example, if Joe Doe decides to go for a drive, he might run out of gas or have a flat tire and remain stranded on the road, if the President of the country decides to go somewhere by car, those situations just won’t happen.” – Respectfully sir, I disagree that “logic says such accidents can’t happen,” and that is OK, because: This is the place where God becomes the Joe Doe; all souls are incredibly mighty in their own way, and yet unplanned (novel = meaningful) events can happen here, for their benefit. Great planning went into our simulation precisely so that Joe Doe might run out of gas, unanticipated, and have to deal with it. The possibility of unanticipated outcome is itself precisely the provided opportunity.
Regarding: “I don’t know exactly how to interpret this, I’m sorry if I’ve upset you with my theories” – Not upset sir, it’s just that at the soul level what is known is known, there is no need for me at the human level to postulate intellectually from our local non-native duality-based-thinking perspective; and meanwhile, my experience with the mother is very personal and dear to me, for me it is not simply fodder for conjecture. My fear choice while in the womb caused an effect that I couldn’t go back on (and I feel that is an important point); the opportunity was lost, and that was known to me. Even now I am responsible for that choice, and am on my current path in part because of it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When we are done on this Earth and it’s time to go back across the veil do we have the opportunity to do it again? -Will
LikeLike
Yes, we have the choice to incarnate again physically if we wish to. If that doesn’t speak to your question please let me know sir! 🙂
LikeLike
It does!!! Thank you sir for your response. Your book (specifically your experience) has started a deep exploration into NDE’s/OBE’s reading books like that from Dr Moody and Dr Long. I don’t know why this research/knowledge/purpose is not “going viral” like Tesla tweets! Lol.
I hope that you put together a Q&A session one day. I would love to learn more about your experience. But until that time, thank you truly, for responding to these comments. I will continue to share your book and experience with others!!!
Major William Capp
US Army
LikeLiked by 1 person